Alexander Katrompas, PhD
Professor, Computer Science

Generative AI Statement


Preface

The following is my official statement on the use of generative AI in my courses. This statement and philosophy directly leads to what I call the AI Integrated Classroom, where generative AI is not only permitted and encouraged, it may be required. If you are a student in one of my courses, you are expected to read and understand this statement and the AI integrated classroom.

If you code with AI as a student, watch this video (required in some courses). You may also want to read this piece on Learning in the Age of AI. If you are curious as to how I believe teaching should proceed in the age of AI, you can read Teaching in the Age of AI and Teaching in the Age of AI: Part II.


Statement

Generative AI is transforming the way we work and learn, and I believe it is essential that students are equipped with the skills to use AI effectively. As a practical matter, AI is no longer optional in our professional and educational lives, and is now essential to excel in either. Just as we would not consider teaching programming without a compiler, or writing without a word processor, we should no longer consider learning or teaching without AI. AI is a tool that can enhance learning and productivity, and it is my responsibility as an educator to ensure that my students are proficient and ethical in its use.

The use of AI raises important ethical and academic integrity concerns. It is crucial that students understand the ethical implications of using AI, and that they use it responsibly. This includes understanding the potential for bias in AI-generated content, the importance of properly attributing AI-generated work, and the need to critically evaluate AI-generated content for accuracy and reliability.

In courses taugh by me, the following will be taught and expected regarding the use of generative AI:

  • Any and all generative AI tools may be used to assist with assignments, including (but not limited to) generating code, researching concepts, testing ideas, and drafting written material.

  • Generative AI will be taught and used ethically and responsibly, with a clear understanding of its capabilities and limitations.

  • Some courses will require the use of generative AI for certain assignments, and students will be expected to demonstrate proficiency in its use. In these cases, the use of AI is no more optional than the use of a compiler or text editor.

  • Generative AI is intended to facilitate learning, not replace it. You are expected to understand the work you submit—whether it was produced by you directly, by AI, or collaboratively. If you cannot explain your work and reasoning when asked, then you have not demonstrated learning and will not receive credit for that assignment.

  • You are fully responsible for all work you submit, including work generated with the assistance of AI. If an AI-generated solution is incorrect, incomplete, or poorly reasoned, that responsibility—and the resulting grade—belongs to you.

  • Multiple techniques will be used during the semester to encourage and verify understanding, including (but not limited to) extensive documentation of work and conforming to best practices in both coding and writing. Failure to meet these documentation standards will result in a loss of credit, regardless of the correctness of the underlying work.
If you have any questions about the use of generative AI, please ask.